Brief Communication
 

Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions – Technique, Materials, Procedure, in the light of Anatomical- and Technical Considerations
Johannes B. Dahm, Frank van Buuren,

Department of Cardiology-Angiology, Heart-& Vascular Center Neu-Bethlehem, Göttingen, Germany

Department of Cardiology, Heart-& Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

Abstract
Transradial access is associated with enhanced patients’ comfort, significant lower complication rates in diagnostic coronary angiography and better immediate and long-term outcomes after transradial percutaneous coronary interventions.  Access failure has been reported to occur in less than 3-7% of cases due to anatomical circumstances (e.g., anomalous radial branching patterns, tortuosity e.g. radial loops, and small radial artery diameters).  Radial coronary angiography and angioplasty entail a secondary learning curve of at least 150 cases in order to become familiar and comfortable with this technique.  In contrast to previous established techniques (e.g. Sones-arteriotomy), the patient should be positioned in a comfortable supine position with his right arm next to his hip and the interventionist next to the right side of the patient. 19 gauge needles and 0.018 inch wires enhance the chance of successful cannulation the radial artery.  A spasmolytic cocktail (3 mg Dinitrate, 3 mg verapamil, at least 3.000 U Heparine) should always be given intraarterially.  Longer sheaths (> 13 cm) are not necessary.  Essential for easy passage of the vertebralian artery and the common brachio-cephalic trunc (as the most dangerous part of the procedure) in order to reach the ascending aorta, the patient should be asked for a deep inspiration and/or dorsoflexion of his head.  An Amplatz-II catheter can be used for LCA, RCA and in some cases for LV-angiogram.  The sheath should always be removed immediately and hemostasis achieved by radial compression (e.g. clamp).
There is a close relationship between access failure respective radial spasm or occlusions and anatomical circumstances (i.e., hypoplastic radial artery, radioulnar loop, or small radial diameters: radial diameter-to-catheter ration < 1.0; assessment by Duplex).  Although the radial access can be used in the majority of patients, the use is limited in patients with very small radial diameters and/or with complex lesions (e.g kissing balloon, etc).

 

Overtime transradial artery has shown lower complication rates in diagnostic coronary angiography, hence is successfully introduced as a useful vascular access site for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions, since Kiemeneij et al (1995,1997). reported similar procedural and clinical outcomes as compared to transfemoral, and transbrachial access ( , ).  Moreover, recent data from prospective multicenter studies and large meta analysis revealed even significantly better immediate and long-term outcomes with radial access versus femoral access in contemporary, real-world clinical settings of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures (e.g. PREVAIL-, PRESTO-ACS-studies).  In this perspective, the lower rate of cardiovascular events after transradial percutaneous coronary interventions may be explained by the lower necessity of cessation of dual-antiplatelet therapy due to significant lower bleeding complications after radial access.  Radial access enhance patients’ comfort and reduces hospital staff workload and hospital ( , ).  Access failure has been reported to occur in less than 3-7% of cases (2).

 

 

 

Bleeding complications occur only rarely with this technique as compared to the transfemoral access, but the procedural success of the transradial access is occasionally limited by anatomical circumstances (e.g., anomalous radial branching patterns, tortuosity e.g. radial loops, and small radial artery diameters), which require enhanced capabilities of well trained interventionists in femoral approach.  Radial coronary angiography and angioplasty entail a secondary learning curve of at least 150 cases in order to become familiar and comfortable with this technique.  In the following, our radial catheterization procedure, as a result of more than 10 years of radial experience including constantly implementing new developing and materials is been described in detail.
Radial puncture procedure

Prerequisites for a radial procedure are a sufficiently pulsating radial artery and presence of an ulnar pulse with a sufficient palmar arch, as evidenced by the absence of digital ischemia according to the Allen test.  The catherization procedure (coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty/stent implantation) should be carried out with the patient in a

 

Correspondence: Dr Johannes Bruno Dahm, Dept. of Cardiology-AngiologyHeart-& Vascular Center Neu-BethlehemHumboldtallee 6, D – 37073 Göttingen Germany
Email:dahm@herz-gefaesszentrum.org

Indian Heart J. 2010-62;214-217
 
214
Current Technique in Transradial
 
 

comfortable supine position with his right arm laterally elevated only during the arterial puncture procedure (Fig. 1).  After successful placing the introducer sheath, the arm is positioned alongside the body with wrist next to the hip (right arm) (Fig. 2) respective on the patient (left arm).  This approach includes the benefit of standing on the normal interventionists position next to the right side of the patient, where majority of custom made coronary catheterization laboratories have preinstalled the radiation protection measures (e.g. shielding) to guarantee  maximum radiation protection.

Figure 1.  Radial puncture position (white arrow) proximal the base of Dig. I (still above   the bony part of the handroot).

Figure 2.Positioning of the punctured arm alongside the patients body with his wrist next to his hip.

After local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, the radial artery is punctured approximately 1-2 cm proximal the base of Dig. I (Fig. 1, Fig. 3a).  The puncture of the radial artery is far most easy using a 19 gauge needle and a 0.018-0.022 inch stainless steel guide wire, before a 4F-, 5F- or 6F sheath is introduced with a shaped dilatator (e.g. Prelude Sheath Introducer, MeritMedical LTD, Galway, Ireland; Check-Flo Performer, Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN) following the Seldinger technique (Fig. 3b).  Needles with a longer shaped opening (³ 21 gauge) can more

 

often lead to extravascular wire exit just outside the artery, because parts of the longer needle-opening may remain outside the effectively punctured artery, while major parts of the longer opening are adequately positioned inside the artery and show a normal flush-back of blood. 
Right-arm access
After successfully introducing the vascular sheath, the right arm should be positioned alongside the patient’s body with the arm and forearm slightly rotated laterally, and the wrist supine and secured on a specially designed armplank next to the hip (Fig. 2).  In keeping the procedure as simple- and radiation exposure as low as possible, the right radial artery is the preferred approach.  Only in case of a pathological unilateral Allen test on the right or in patients after coronary bypass surgery with anastomized left mammarian arteries, the left approach should necessarily be chosen. 

Figure 3 a Puncture of the radial artery approximately 1-2 cm proximal the base of Dig. I using a 19 gauge needle.

 

Figure 3 b        Typical anatomical position of a 5F-introducer sheath

Left-arm access
After successful puncture with the arm elevated laterally, the arm is positioned and secured on foam pillows on a arm panel located on the left side with the lower arm slightly angulated so that the wrist can be positioned medially on the lower belly. 

 

215
 
Indian Heart J. 2010;62;214-217
Johannes B. Dahm et al;
 

Adjunct Pharmacological Therapy
In order to prevent radial spasm and posprocedural occlusion, 3 mg dinitrate (or molsidomin) and 3 mg verapamil should be administered through the sheath together with at least 3.000 IU of heparine.  All patients should be under aspirine and/or clopidogrel medication.  At least in patients predisposing for radial spasm and/or post-procedural occlusion (e.g. females, smokers, small radial diameter), antiphlogistic drugs should be described in order to prevent postprocedural radial arteritis (e.g. 400 mg ibuprofen twice daily for 3 days) predisposing for postprocedural radial occlusions.

Catheterization procedure
With respect to radial spasm and postprocedural occlusion, coronary angiograms with respect to angioplasty procedures (balloon angioplasty and stent implantation) should be performed with preferably 4-5F catheters (diagnostic catheters: Infinity or Super TorquePlus, Cordis Corp. Miami, FL; guiding catheter: Vista brite tip, Cordis Corp. Miami, FL, USA, Launcher, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), RunWay, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), and with application of standard balloon angioplasty and stenting techniques. 
In case of a right radial access, Amplatz II  should be the first choice for the left- and in more than 90% of the cases for the right  coronary ostium and saphenous bypass grafts.  Particularly in case of a left radial access, EBU (XB) or Judkins left respective Judkins right can be an alternative for engaging the left- respective right coronary ostium. 
In passing the arteries of the lower arm retrogradely, the use of a floppy PTFE-wire is strongly recommended, because the arteries are still small and J-shaped wires may easily cause dissections and spasm.  Due to economic reasons, we normally do not use any wire while passing the arteries of the lower arm retrogradely with a soft-tipped Cordis diagnostic catheter (5F or 4 F); a J-shaped 260cm wire is been introduced not earlier than in the axillian- or subclavian artery.

Figure 4 a        Amplatz II in a stable position in the ascending aorta.

Figure 4 b        LCA (RAO 30°): Catheter-tip in the left sinus valsalva, bend of Amplatz            catheter close to the aortic valve; catheter must be turned to the left in order to engage the LCA.

 

Passing the vertebralian artery and common brachio-cephalic trunk is the most critical part of the entire catheterization procedure (i.e. cerebral thromboembolic complications). Therefore and for easy passage into the ascending aorta, continous low-dose fluoroscopy (2-3 frames/sec) is strongly recommended, while asking the patient for a deep inspiration and/or dorsoflexion of the neck.  This maneuver gives rise to a caudal movement of the mediastinum and heart, initiating straightening of the great vessels, leading to a much easier and more successful passage of this potentially critical arteries.
After having placed the Amplatz II successfully in a stable position in the ascending aorta (Fig. 4 a), the catheter should be turned to the right to bring the tip into the left sinus valsalva (RAO 30°).  With the tip in the left sinus valsalva and the bend of the Amplatz-curve close to the aortic valve, the catheter must then been turned to the left in order to engage the LCA in RAO 30° (Fig. 4 b).
For cannulation of the RCA, the Amplatz-II should be placed into a central position of the ascending aorta close to the aortic valve, and then turned right into the right sinus valsalva while the patient inspirate deeply maintaining breathing (LAO 30°) (Fig. 4 c).
Because the Amplatz-II includes a ideal design for being placed safely into the left ventricle with its openings positioned freely in the LV-cavum, we use it also for handinjected LV-angiograms in patients without valvular disease or dilatative cardiomyopathies (Fig. 4 d).
Sheath Removal and Clamping
Because radial occlusions were associated with prolonged cannulation times ( , , ), the sheath should be removed immediately and hemostasis achieved by radial compression with an artery compression clamp (e.g. RadStat Radial comression system, MeritMedical Sastems Inc. South Jordan, Utah, USA) for 2-4 h.  Ideally, the radial clamp consists of easily adjustable foam liners and straps on a wrist support board with a  central strap-clamp for radial compression (Fig. 5).

Figure 4 c     RCA (LAO 30°): Amplatz II in a central position of ascending aorta with its   tip in the right sinus valsalva in deep inspiration, while turning right in order toengage the RCA.

Figure 4 d Amplatz II in left ventricle with its tip positioned freely in the LV-cavum.

287
 
Indian Heart J. 2010;62;214-217
 
Current Technique in Transradial
 

Figure 5           Radial clamp with easily adjustable straps on a wrist support board with a                          central strap-clamp for radial compression (RadStat Radial comression system,                   MeritMedical Sastems Inc. South Jordan, Utah, USA)


Complications; Impact of sheath/catheter dimensions and arterial diameter
There is a close relationship between access failure respective radial spasm and occlusions and anatomical circumstances (i.e., hypoplastic radial artery, radioulnar loop, or small radial diameters)(7).  Although radial occlusion generally occurs without clinical sequelae (due to collateral circulation to the hand), it should be avoided whenever possible:  not least, to also maintain a patent vascular access site.  Saito et al (1999) ascertained that radial spasm and postprocedural occlusion, are the major complications of radial access, which occur more frequently in patients with a radial diameter-to-catheter ration < 1.0,demonstrating that the mean radial inner diameters of patients dictate that only 71.5% of female and 85.7% of male patients can physically accept 6F guiding catheters (mean radial diameter = 3.1 ± 0.6 mm in males and 2.8 ± 0.6 mm in females) ( )  These conditions lead to impaired radial flow and, in turn, to a higher rate of radial spasm.  Campeau (1989) has reported that the incidence of severe radial flow reduction varies between 6% and 7.5% with 6 F guiding catheters, and that it exceeds 8-10% with 8F catheters. ( )
In a prospective randomized study at our centre, the main reason for procedural failure was profound radial spasms, which occurred predominantly in patients treated with greater guiding catheters (6F) as compared to those treated with 5F guiding catheters and the radial diameter-to-catheter ratio was < 1.0 for all 6F patients in which profound radial spasm occurred ( ).

It is particularly among the patients with radial diameter-to-catheter ratio < 1.0 that 5F guiding catheter help to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural failures and vascular access complications such as radial occlusions and hematomas, but 5F. guiding catheter offer less strength and visibility ( ).  In addition, lesions which require more bulky

devices or techniques (e.g. kissing balloon) can not been treated using 5F guiding catheters.
4F diagnostic angiography is a new perspective in patients with small radial diameters (i.e. females).  Although visibility, strength and torquability is even lower as compared to 5F, it offers less complications in patients predisposing for radial spasm (e.g. smokers).  Unfortunately, the 4F catherization procedure ask for a second ‘learning curve’ to become familiar with these ultra-thin catheters.  In numerous cases 0.35’’ wires are necessary to stabilize the 4 F catheter and assure torquability.
Opafication of the inner catheter with instillation of contrast media is an effective means of compensation for the reduced visibility of the 4F or 5F catheters as one of the major disadvantages of small catheters and radial access.  On the contrary, an important advantage of 4-5F-catheter, moreover is, that it can be intubated deeply and selectively into coronaries (i.e. for PCI; stent-placement).  In certain cases in which delivery of a stent through profound atheromatous lesions or tortousities on the way to the culprit lesion is hazardous, the capability for deep intubation of a 5F guiding catheter can represent a crucial feature and can afford additional safety.

REFERENCES

.Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E.. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995 Jan;129(1):1-7
. Kiemeneij F. et al. A Randomized Comparison of Transradial, Brachial, and Femoral Coronary Angioplasty (ACCESS) with 6F Guide Catheters. JACC 1997;29:1269-1275
. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, Wieken RVD. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;40:156-158.
. Mann JT, Cubeddu MG, Schneider JE, Arrowood M. Right radial access for PTCA: A prospective study demonstrating reduced complications and hospital charges. J inv Cardiol 1996;8:40D-44D.
.Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1-8
.Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1983;59:42-47
.Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, Thebault B, Cheveau M, Ben Hamda K, Guillard N, Py A, Monsegu J, Guerin F. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: Results of a prospective trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:365-370
. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S: Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Feb;46(2):173-8.
.Campeau L. Percutaneous radial approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7
. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Völzke H, Felix SB. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Oct;57(2):172-6.
. Schobel WA, Spyridopoulos I, Hoffmeister HM, Seipel L. Percutaneous coronary interventions using a new 5 French guiding catheter: results of a prospective study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 Jul;53(3):308-12

217
 
Indian Heart J. 2010;62;214-217