Case Report |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Introduction: |
was one of the first bare metal stents (BMS) approved in USA. Subsequently, many more bare metal stents came on the market, but the significant problem of restenosis remained as a major issue. In 2003, a drug-eluting stent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set another mile stone in reduction of restenosis3. This therapeutic effect of drug-eluting stent was very impressive with consistently positive reports from subsequent small group trials and first hand experience of the physicians, which led to remarkable adoption of drug-eluting stents, even in patients where there was no approved indications. This use of drug-eluting stents was termed as an “off-label” use. Subsequently in the years 2005 and 2006, many small reports questioned the safety of drug-eluting stents, especially late stent thrombosis. Some of the studies which prompted media attention included a BASKET-LATE 4 a study presented in the American College of Cardiology in March of 2006, and subsequently a Camenzind’s meta analysis presented at the European Society of Cardiology in September 2006. Later, there was also a publication by the SCAAR5 (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty registry) registry group from Sweden which got immediate attention of the worldwide interventional community in cardiology. Their landmark analysis at 6 months showed no difference in mortality among bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents but after 6 months, there was increased mortality in the drug-eluting stent group. This set off a worldwide panic and Swedish government prohibited the use of drug-eluting stents unless absolutely needed, media calling the drug-eluting stents “a million ticking time bombs” |
||||||||||||
Correspondence: Dr. Shrivana Ray, Head of the Department of cardiology, A.M.R.I. Hospitals, Salt Lake, Kolkata., West Bengal, India |
|||||||||||||
Indian Heart J. 2010; 62:176-178 |
|
||||||||||||
Thrombosuction with Export Aspiration Catheter during PCI in AMI | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Indian Heart J. 2010; 62:176-178 |
||||||||||||
Shuranan Ray et.al, |
|||||||||||||
After angiographic visualization LMCA was engaged with a 7F extra backup(XB) guide catheter Over the PTCA guide wire the Export Aspiration thrombosuction Catheter (Figure 2) was positioned in the ostium of LAD and with maintained negative suction this was advanced distally. After thrombosuction LAD was cleared of any visible thrombus and TIMI – III blood flow was achieved (Figure 3). No stenosis was seen after thrombosuction. Stenting was not required. Post-Procedure Course in the Hospital: |
Patient was a non diabetic, normotensive, non smoker. His serum homocysteine level was 46μmol/litre. Blood levels of protein C, protein S, anti-thrombin III, factor V, factor VIII, vWF, fibrinogen, lupus anticoagulant were all within normal limits. Patient was discharged with antiplatelets, statins, ACE inhibitor, betablockers and antianginals and molecules targeted to normalize hyperhomocysteinaemia (Homochek-folic acid 1 mg, Pyridoxine 10 mg, cyanocobalamine 400 mcg).
Follow-up Coronary Angiography: |
||||||||||||
|
Indian Heart J. 2010; 62:176-178 |
||||||||||||
Shuranan Ray et.al, | |||||||||||||
Discussion: The door to balloon time was less than one hour in the present case under discussion. The central attraction of the entire interventional pursuit in this case lies in the fact that thrombosuction alone decreased the thrombus burden so effectively that TIMI III flow was achieved. After clearing of the thrombi no significant lesion was visible that could have mandated coronary angioplasty and stenting. Primary angioplasty and stenting of the occluded culprit artery is now the most widely accepted treatment of acute MI. Dilatation of the coronary artery leads to disruption of plaque and stent-deployment results in shifting of the plaque. Disruption and shifting of plaque may result in distal embolisation of plaque debris or thrombus in an already thrombotic milieu compromising the prospect of effective myocardial salvage. Situation becomes more critical if the infarct related artery is loaded with thrombus. To overcome this problem different devices have been invented. The Guard Wire Plus System (Percu Surge) distal protection device is an example of such device. Initially Guard Wire Plus System was used in saphenous vein and carotid vessels for containment of embolisation and later it was thought that it can be used in coronary artery. However the experience with this device in coronary artery was not smooth because of long time required in addition to the technical limitations like high profile, need of occlusive mechanism, low trackability and low maneuverability of the device. Still later EAC, (5.4x3.5 Fr distal 35 cm monorail section and 4.6Fr proximal section,135 cm long catheter with0.040 inch diameter of internal lumen that can accommodate 0.014 inch coronary angioplasty guide wire) which is only a component of the Guard Wire Plus System, was designed for thrombosuction. Woong Chol Kang et al in their series of 62 patients compared PCI plus thrombosuction (Group A-n=31) with PCI minus thrombosuction 2. TIMI flow improved in group A just by performing thrombosuction in 19 patients(61.3%). |
Interestingly after thrombosuction with EAC in one patient the coronary flow was completely restored without any distal embolisation or residual stenosis. Thus the procedure was completed without any additional intervention. Conclusion: In acute MI thrombosuction with Export Aspiration Catheter can effectively reduce thrombus load of infarct related artery. It may at times be all that is required without any further need of angioplasty & stenting. When post thrombosuction angiographic image demonstrates critical flow-limiting stenotic lesions suitable for angioplasty-stenting, then also thrombosuction prevents or reduces MACE, opening the horizon of successful intervention and reduction in the nightmares of the operator. References: |
||||||||||||
Indian Heart J. 2010; 62:176-178 |
|