Clinical Research Article
 

Transcoronary Pacing: Are The Modern Wires Effective?
Neeraj Parakh, Sanjeev Asotra, Sandeep Singh, S. Ramakrishnan, Ganeshan Karthikeyan,
Sandeep Seth, Balram Bhargava
Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Cardiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India

Abstract
Aims/Objective: Coronary guide wires can be used for pacing the left ventricle during coronary angioplasty,
however the experience with modern coronary guide wires as pacing wires is limited. The aim of this study was
to determine the safety and efficacy of currently used coronary guide wires for transcoronary pacing.
Methods and Results: Transcoronary pacing was tested in 25 patients who were scheduled to undergo elective
coronary angioplasty. Four different coronary guide wires were tested using an adaptive alligator clip
connecting the guide wire to the pulse generator. Resistance of various guide wires was also measured ex vivo
at 150, 175 and 190 cms from the tip respectively. BMW and Galeo wires were used in 12 and 11 patients
respectively while Couger and Magic wire were used in one patient each. Pacing was successful in all patients
with no pacing related complication. Most patients had unifocal ventricular ectopics. Mean threshold varied
between 4 mA to 5.54 mA. Resistance varied from 12 ohms to 31 ohms depending upon the wire and distance
from the tip.
Conclusion: Transcoronary pacing using modern coronary guide wires appears to be dependable, well
tolerated and safe temporary measure for significant bradyarrhythmias.
Key words:Transcoronary, Guide wire, Pacing

Introduction


Significant bradyarrhythmias during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been reported to occur in up to 2% of cases1. Prophylactic transvenous pacing is commonly used for bradyarrhythmias during complex PTCA and right coronary artery (RCA) intervention. It is rarely associated with complications such as ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis and arterio-venous fistula. The global percentage of these complications has been reported to vary between 1 to 20% 2, 3. Coronary guide wire or any other guide wire can be used for emergency pacing from the coronary artery or the left ventricle. The difference in speed between inserting a tranvenous
pacemaker and pacing over the coronary guide wire may be important in case of severe bradycardia or complete asystole unless a venous introducer had been placed prophylactically, which is less often done now-a-days. There is little experience of pacing with the newer generation of coronary guide wires as substantial changes in guide wire technology have occurred. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and

 

effectiveness of currently available commonly used coronary guide wires for pacing, thereby precluding the need for insertion
of temporary pacing catheter.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
25 patients who were scheduled to undergo elective coronary angioplasty were taken up for the study. Patient with acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome and severe left ventricular dysfunction were excluded. Patients underwent coronary angioplasty either through femoral approach or radial approach. After the cannulation of coronary artery ostium with a guiding catheter, a 0.014" coronary guide wire was advanced distally across the lesion into the coronary artery. Proximal end of the guide wire was connected to an external pulse generator (5348, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA), using an adaptive alligator clip. The pulse generator provided a variable output current while maintaining a fixed pulse width of 40 miliseconds. The negative pole (cathode) was attached to the end of angioplasty wire and the positive role (anode) to the patient in the groin near
the puncture site making the angioplasty wire function as a unipolar lead. Pacing was started at a rate of 100 pulses per

Correspondence: Dr Balram Bhargava, Suite No-20, 7th Floor, Cardiothoracic sciences center, A.I.I.M.S, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India-110029
E-mail:balrambhargava@yahoo.com

160
 
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:160-162
 
 
Transcoronary Pacing
 

minute or higher than the intrinsic heart rate, at the maximum output of pulse generator (20 mA). The output was then decreased to determine the threshold current and pacing was continued for about 30 seconds. If the coronary pacing was not possible at maximum output of pulse generator, the guide wire was advanced more deeply or introduced into a different intramyocardial branch. After threshold testing, the output current was set two to three times above the capture threshold output to provide the safety margin. All patients received intravenous heparin at the beginning of intervention. Non-ionic contrast was used in all cases. Glycoprotein (Gp)IIb/IIIa inhibitor was used during or after the intervention, if indicated. The site of pacing was recorded according to the location of target lesion. After the procedure, we measured the resistance of coronary guide wire ex vivo. Resistance was measured using a commercial grade Ohmmeter with a constant 2.6 volt charge across the wire. Each wire was placed in a straight line on a nonconductive surface. One Ohmmeter electrode was securely attached within 2 cm of the wire tip and the other placed at 150 cm from the tip. Additional measurements of resistance were made with one electrode at 175 cm and 190 cm (if available), keeping the position of electrode at the tip unchanged. The circuit of voltmeter along with the alligator clips had an intrinsic resistance of 0.17 ohms. At the each electrode location, three measured resistances were recorded after the stable readings had been obtained. At the 150 cm from tip, the alligator clip was roughly at the point, where the wire would exit the distal end of an over the wire balloon.
RESULTS
Coronary guide wire pacing was done in 25 patients who underwent coronary angioplasty. Out of which 21 (84%) were males and 4 (16%) were females. Mean age was 53.7 + 8.97 years. 21 patients underwent coronary angioplasty through right femoral artery approach and 4 patients through left radial approach. In three patients pacing was done in more than one cardiac territory. In eleven patients, Galeo wire (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) was used. BMW wire (Guidant Corp., St. Paul, MN, USA) was used in twelve
patients. Magic wire (Meditech/Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and Couger wire (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) was used in one patient each. Pacing thresholds of the various guide wires are described in table-1. In fifteen patients wire was placed in the terminal branch of left anterior descending artery (LAD) and in three patients wire was placed in the terminal obtuse marginal branch (OMB). In the RCA territory, wire was kept in terminal posterior descending artery (PDA) branch in three patients

and terminal posterolateral ventricular (PLV) branch in six patients. No patient required repositioning of wire. There were no coronary guide wire related complications. Most patients had infrequent unifocal ventricular ectopics. In all patients intravenous heparin was given to maintain activated
clotting time (aCT) level above 300 seconds. No patient had any pericardial collection during or after the procedure. Bench top testing of resistance, at l50 cms, l75cms and l90 cms from the tip of guide wire was done ex vivo and results are described in table-2.

Table-1 Pacing thresholds with various coronary guide wires
Table-2. Ex vivo mean resistance (In ohms) at various distances
from the tip of coronary guide wire
* Galeo wire has a usable length of 175 cm only with 3 cm of radio-opaque tip.

DISCUSSION
Complications associated with transvenous pacing catheter has prompted the society of cardiac angiography and intervention to advice against routine pacemakers during coronary angioplasty4. A normal ECG or absence of ongoing myocardial ischemia is no guarantee against severe bradycardia during coronary angioplasty and even diagnostic invasive procedure5, 6. Temporary pacing is routinely recommended during complex PTCA and during rheolytic thrombectomy. In the earlier reports of rheolytic thrombectomy, temporary pacing was required in approximately 35% of interventions in RCA and 16% of interventions in LAD artery7. In Vegas II trial using rheolytic thrombectomy, significant bradycardia occurred in 24% of patients8. Severe bradyarrthymia requires prompt pacing and the introduction of venous catheter at that moment. It may necessitate cardiac massage until pacing is available. External pacing systems require additional material and are uncomfortable for the patient9. An ideal pacing system for standby during invasive cardiology should be expeditious and efficient when required. It should necessitate little additional time and material, and be free of serious side effects. Coronary guide wire pacing meets the above said criteria.

Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:160-162
 
161
 
Neeraj Parakh et al
 

Transcoronary cardiac pacing during myocardial ischemia using coronary guide wire have been well established in animal studies and may serve as a reliable back up system during interventional procedures complicated by bradyarrhythmias10. Meier et al had previously demonstrated feasibility and safety of temporary pacing using coronary guide wire as a unipolar pacemaker lead. They established ventricular pacing in 25 coronary arteries at acceptable pacing thresholds and without any apparent adverse events8. Although first reported in 1985, this technique is not yet widely used as the need of pacing is infrequent during PCI. de la Serna et al have supported the safety and efficacy of this technique in a large series of 300 patients11. They reported a failure rate of 3% which was due to pacing attempts in the infracted areas where thresholds were likely to be high. Another reason cited by them was insufficient contact of the pacing wire with the myocardium. In our study, coronary pacing proved reliable and there was no failure to capture in all the 25 patients. Coronary mapping of pacing thresholds in animals showed that the lowest thresholds are found when guide wires are placed distally in small intra myocardial arteries. If it is not possible to advance the wire into an intramyocardial branch, pacing may fail even at maximum output levels of conventional pulse generators. In our study we kept the pacing wire at the predetermined sites and there was no difficulty in placing of coronary angioplasty wire at different vascular sites. de la Sarna et al had a success rate of 99%, 99% and 93% in the LAD, left circumflex ( LCX) and RCA territories respectively. The observed difference in the success rates between various vessels is difficulty in reaching intramyocardial branches with guide wire in RCA11. In our study no patient had pacing wire related complication. de La serna et al observed a 2% incidence of coronary artery spasm which is not different from the prevalence of coronary artery spasm in the routine coronary angioplasty11. Prolonged coronary pacing at high output is likely to produce spasm and thrombosis. Should prolonged pacing be necessary, a right ventricular pacing catheter can be introduced under the protection of coronary to left ventricular pacing. Recently Heinroth et al12 have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of transcoronary pacing in 70 patients undergoing PTCA. They demonstrated a pacing efficacy of 85.7%. 3 (4.3%) patients developed coronary spasm that reversed with intracoronary nitroglycerine. In their study they used only guide wires from Guidant (Guidant Corp, St. Paul; USA).

Diaphragmatic stimulation and stinging pain sensation at the surface electrode are unpleasent sensations and can be avoided by lowering the output of generator or by placing the coronary guide wire at different location. The use of alligator clip on the groin in our study provided a lower resistance connection of anode to the body. A metal suture placed in the subcutaneous tissue provides lower pacing threshold as compared to the cutaneous electrode13. Bench testing of different wires showed that resistance increased as the distance between the sampling electrodes in the wire increased. Thus, in difficult situations with loss of capture, pacing threshold could be improved by moving the alligator clip as close as possible to the guide wire tip to have the minimum resistance. Proper connection of the pacing circuit may be important since there are theoretical concerns about initiating serious ventricular arrhythmias if the positive pole is connected to the guide wire than the skin14. To conclude, transcoronary pacing using modern coronary guide wires appears to be dependable, well tolerated and safe temporary measure for significant bradyarrhythmias.
REFERENCES
1. Dorros G, Cowley MJ, Simpson J et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: report of complications from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PTCA Registry. Circulation 1983; 67(4):723-30.
2. Seipel L, Breithardt G, Borggrefe M. The development of clinical electrophysiology. Indications, complications and results from 1296 invasive electrophysiological examinations from 1971-1978 in Dusseldorf. Z Kardiol 1984; 73(4):194-8.
3. Austin JL, Preis LK, Cramptom RS etal. Analysis of pacemaker malfunction and complication of temporary pacing in the coronary unit. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49(2):301-6.
4. Greene DG. Right heart catheterization and temporary pacemaker insertion during coronary arteriography for suspected coronary artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1984; 10(5): 429-430.
5. Feit A, Kipperman R, Ursell S, Reddy CV. Complete heart block complicating retrograde left heart catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 20(2):131-2.
6. Brachfeld CA, Marshall J, Volosin KJ, Groh WC. Complete atrioventricular block during cardiac catheterizations: Two cases reports in patients without pre-existing condition abnormalities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 20(2):126-30
7. Mueller RL, Sanborn TA. The history of interventional cardiology: cardiac catheterization, angioplasty and related interventions. Am Heart J 1995; 129(1):146-72.
8. Meier B, Rutishauser W. Coronary pacing during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1985; 71(3):557-61.
9. Falk RH, Zoll PM, Zoll RH. Safety and efficacy of noninvasive cardiac pacing. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1166-1180.
10. Laird JR, Hull R, Stajduhar KC, Weston LT, Kufs W, Wortham DC. Transcoronary cardiac
pacing during myocardial ischaemia. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1993; 30(2):162-5.
11. De La Serna F, Meier B, Pande AK et al. Coronary and left ventricular pacing as stand
by in invasive cardiology. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 25(4):285-9.
12. Heinroth KM, Stabenow I, Moldenhauer I et al. Temporary transcoronary pacing by
coated guidewires: A safe and reliable method during percutaneous coronary intervention
Clin Res Cardiol 2006; 95:206–211.
13. Mixon TA, Cross SS, Lawrence ME, Gantt DS, Dehmer GJ . Temporary coronary guide
wire pacing during percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
2004; 61(4): 494-500.
14. Preston TA. Anodal stimulation as a cause of pacemaker-induced ventricular fibrillation.
Am Heart J 1973; 86(3):366-72.

 

162
 
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:160-162