Clinical Research Article
Santanu Guha et al
 

Dual Antiplatelet Drug Resistance in Patients with
Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Santanu Guha, Partha Sardar, Pradipta Guha, Sarita Roy, Soura Mookerjee,
Prantar Chakrabarti, P. K. Deb, Utpal Chaudhuri, Suryyani Deb, Rathindranath Karmakar,
Anjan Kr. Dasgupta, Prabir Lahiri
Department of Cardiology, Medical College, Kolkata, India

Abstract

Aims and objectives: Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the management of the atherosclerotic vascular disease. Aspirin and clopidogrel are the two most commonly used antiplatelet drugs in its management. Recently, there has been a concern about the development of resistance to one or both antiplatelet agents with potentially devastating consequences. In this study we tried to assess the in vitro resistance to antiplatelet agents in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Materials and Methods: 144 patients presenting with ACS, who were not on any antiplatelet therapy prior to hospital admission were evaluated in this study. Baseline clinical data was obtained before giving the oral loading dose of aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients received a loading dose of 325 mg of aspirin and 300 mg of clopidogrel followed by a daily dose of 150 mg.of aspirin and 75 mg.of clopidogrel. After 7 days of dual antiplatelet therapy, platelet aggregation pattern was analyzed using optical aggregometer (chrono-log). Response to aspirin and clopidogrel was assessed by interaction with collagen (2µg/ml) and Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10µM/ml) respectively. The results were analyzed. Response to doubling the dose of antiplatelet agents was also observed in 6 aspirin resistant patients, 12 clopidogrel resistant patients and in 6 patients resistant to the effect of dual antiplatelet agents.

Results: There were 22 patients (15.27%) who showed poor response to aspirin, 28 patients (19.44 %) to clopidogrel (primary non-responder) and 18 patients (12.5%) showed a primary non-responsiveness to both the antiplatelet agents in the usual doses. After dose doubling, all 6 aspirin resistant patients showed adequate response but 4 out of 12 clopidogrel resistant patients showed inadequate response.

Conclusions: This pilot study brings out a disquieting picture of 12.5% patients suffering from ACS showing resistance to the antiplatelet effects of both aspirin and clopidogrel in the conventional dose. A long-term prospective randomized controlled trial is required to give an insight into this problem and its clinical consequences.

Key words: Platelet, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Drug resistance

 

Introduction

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel (P2Y12 receptor antagonist) and aspirin [cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1) enzyme inhibitor] represents an important advancement in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)1. The Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration in their Meta-analysis has documented the beneficial effect of aspirin2. The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) and The Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trials revealed the additive clinical benefit of clopidogrel to aspirin3,4. However, despite dual
antiplatelet therapy, major cardiovascular events occurred in about 9% of patients5. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are emerging clinical entities which have lead to severe consequences such as myocardial infarction, stroke or death6. Although unique definitions for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are yet to be formulated, the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance has been reported to be between 5 and 30% in world literature7. There is a great need to appropriately identify antiplatelet drug resistance so that therapy can be individualized. In this pilot study we tried to assess the resistance to antiplatelet agents in patients presenting with ACS.
Correspondence: Prof (Dr) Santanu Guha, Head of The Department, Department of Cardiology, Medical College, 88 College Street, Kolkata 700073
West Bengal, INDIA, E-mail: guhas55@hotmail.com
24
 
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
Dual Antiplatelet Drug Resistance in ACS
 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Methods: Study group

We prospectively enrolled 144 patients with a diagnosis of ACS between July 2008 and December 2008 after obtaining their written consent. The patients were recruited from consecutive patients admitted to the cardiology ward and ICCU. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients who were >21 years old and taking both aspirin and clopidogrel (325 mg of aspirin and 300mg clopidogrel as loading dose and 150 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel as daily maintenance dose) for > 7 days were eligible for enrollment. Exclusion criteria was use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, family or personal history of bleeding disorders, platelet count <150x103 /L or >450 x103/ L. Out of a total 144 patients, 106 had ST elevated acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) and 38 had Non ST elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).

Blood samples

Blood samples for platelet function assays were collected from an antecubital vein using a 21-gauge needle 2 to 4 hours after the last dose of antiplatelet therapy. The first 2 to 4 mL of blood was discarded to avoid spontaneous platelet activation. Blood samples were collected in 3.2% citrated plasma.

Platelet Function Analysis

Platelet Aggregation (PA) with 2mg/ml collagen and 10mM ADP was performed with light transmittance aggregometry in all patients according to the standard protocol8,9. Tests were done within 3 hours of sampling with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by the turbidimetric method in a 2-channel aggregometer (Chrono-Log 490 Model, Chrono-Log Corp, Havertown, Pa). PRP was obtained as a supernatant after centrifugation of citrated blood at 800 rpm for 10 minutes. The isolated PRP was kept at 37°C before use. Curves were recorded for 6 minutes. For optical platelet aggregation, optical density changes were detected photoelectrically as platelets began to aggregate. ADP promotes the release of endogenous ADP and thromboxane A2 when added to platelet-rich plasma causing irreversible aggregation. Collagen is used to evaluate the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation by aspirin. The addition of collagen to platelet-rich plasma enhances platelet aggregation by producing thromboxane A2.

Definition of low response

Platelet aggregation studies were done 7 days after the loading dose. Patients with >70% aggregation with collagen(2 mg/ml) but <70% aggregation with ADP (10mM) were labeled as aspirin resistant and >70% aggregation with ADP (10mM ) but < 70% aggregation with collagen (2 mg/ml) were labeled as resistant to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel and aspirin dual resistant were defined as > 70% aggregation with both collagen (2 mg/ml) and ADP(10mM ), as previously published in literatures9. Patients showing <70% but >30% aggregation were defined as hyporesponders and <30% aggregation as resistant.

Patients with drug resistance

The maintenance dose of aspirin was doubled (300mg instead of 150 mg) in cases of aspirin resistance. Similarly the maintenance dose of clopidogrel was doubled (150mg instead of 75 mg) in cases of clopidogrel resistance. In cases of dual drug resistance, maintenance dose of both aspirin and clopidogrel was doubled (300mg aspirin and 150 mg clopidogrel). Repeat aggregation studies were performed 7 days after dose doubling.

Statistical Analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean+SD. Variables were analyzed for a normal distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Differences between groups were assessed with the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Unpaired t tests were used for comparison of normally distributed continuous variables between the two groups. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSSv10.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago),

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of patients in the 3 groups based on aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness are presented in Table 1. Among 144 patients, 22 (15.3%) patients showed resistance to aspirin (group A), 28 (19.4 %) patients showed resistance to clopidogrel (group B) and 18 patients (12.5%) showed a primary resistance to both the antiplatelet agents (group C). In aspirin resistant patients (group A, n =22), mean platelet aggregation with 2mg/ml collagen was 76+11.5 % and in clopidogrel resistants (group B, n=28), mean platelet aggregation with 10mM/L ADP was 80+5.3 %,while in the dual drug resistant patients (group C, n=18), it was

Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
69
Santanu Guha et al
 
Figure 1. Mean platelet aggregation with collagen and epinephrine in relation to aspirin and clopidogrel response. Figure 2. Response to aspirin
Figure 3. Response to clopidogrel Figure4. Response to aspirin and clopidogrel (dual drug)
Figure 5. Comparison of response to aspirin and clopidogrel between diabetic and nondiabetic patients Figure 6. Comparison of response to aspirin and clopidogrel between hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients
70
 
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
Dual Antiplatelet Drug Resistance in ACS
 
Figure 7. Comparison of response to aspirin and clopidogrel between smoker and nonsmoker patients Figure 8. Comparison of response to aspirin and clopidogrel between patients with elevated LDL and normal LDL.
Table 1. Baseline and laboratory characteristics
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
71
Santanu Guha et al  
 
81.2+4.9 % and 84.6+ 2.8 % with 2 mg/ml collagen and 10 µM of ADP respectively(figure 1).

When response to aspirin was analysed, it revealed 66.7% of patients were responders, 18.0% of patients were semiresponders (<70% but ³ 30% aggregation) and 15.3% patients were found to be resistant (figure 2).

Similarly, clopidogrel response pattern analysis revealed 26.4% of patients were responders, 54.2% semiresponders (<70% but ³ 30% aggregation) and 19.4% resistant (figure 3).

Dual aspirin and clopidogrel response pattern analysis showed 12.5% of patients were resistant to both the drugs (Figure 4).

Aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness in patients with different risk factors is shown in figures 5, 6, 7 and 8. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance were higher (though it did not reach statistical significance) in diabetic patients and smokers (figures 5 & 6). Aspirin resistance was higher in hypertensive patients and patients with elevated LDL (>100mg/dl)-(figures 7 & 8). All other parameters like obesity, ejection fraction and other drug intake did not show any significant difference among single or dual drug resistant groups.

All the six aspirin resistant patients showed adequate response after doubling the maintenance dose. However, among the twelve clopidogrel resistant patients, 8 adequately responded, 2 remained semi responders and no change was found in the remaining 2 patients after doubling the maintenance dose. (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

Aspirin and clopidogrel dual resistance may occur in 5-30% patients depending on the study and the method of determining therapeutic failure as reported in world literature7. Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of aspirin and clopidogrel in prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. The Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration found an approximately 25% reduction in stroke, myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death with aspirin2,6. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine which inhibits ADP-mediated platelet activation6. The Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) study revealed a statistically significant 8.7% (p = 0.043) relative risk reduction in stroke, myocardial infarction or ischaemic death in patients treated with clopidogrel in comparison to aspirin10.

CURE trial found that dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in ACSs reduced adverse coronary events by 20% when compared with aspirin monotherapy3,6. CREDO trial and Per-cutaneous Intervention (PCI)-CURE substudy revealed satisfactory effect of pretreatment and long-term treatment with clopidogrel following stenting4,11. Despite the benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy, many patients continue to suffer adverse consequences of cardiovascular disease6. By understanding the mechanism of antiplatelet drug resistance and treatment failure, therapeutic regimens can be modified for beneficial effect.

A study by Gum et al using optical platelet aggregometry revealed 5% patients to be aspirin-resistant 12. Aspirin and clopidogrel dual resistance in Indian population has not been studied extensively. The most commonly used dose of aspirin prescribed in India is 150 mg OD, which is different from the doses used in western trials on aspirin resistance. Sadiq et al prospectively evaluate the prevalence of aspirin resistance in Indian patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) on 150 mg daily dose of aspirin with 0.5 mg/ml of arachidonic acid and 10 µM ADP. In their study 2.08% patients were found to be aspirin-resistant, 39.58% were aspirin semi-responders and 58.33% were aspirin responders13. H Mardikar et al prospectively studied high risk patients with either established CAD or stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or peripheral vascular disease or with multiple atherothrombotic risk factors and receiving single 150 mg dose of aspirin daily. Patients with PA values more than two S.D. of the mean were termed as hypo-responders to aspirin in this study, 3.1% patients were reported hypo-responders14. Separate criteria was used for defining aspirin resistance in these studies and they assessed only aspirin resistance in patients with stable CAD and those with various cardiovascular diseases or risk factors. In our study, we assessed both aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in patients with ACS in Indian population.

Dual drug resistance to both aspirin and clopidogrel was found in 12% patients, 17% patients were aspirin resistant and 19% patients were clopidogrel resistant. 64% patients showed adequate response to both aspirin and clopidogrel.

A study by AA Desai et al has shown enhanced platelet aggregation induced by various agonists including collagen and ADP in hypertensive patients as compared to normal subjects15. Another study by Joseph Hung revealed that smoking significantly increase platelet aggregation and smoking-enhanced platelet thrombosis may be an important contributory mechanism for acute coronary events in smokers. They also suggest that catecholamine release and enhanced platelet aggregation

72
 
Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
Dual Antiplatelet Drug Resistance in ACS
 

response to in vivo agonists may contribute to the prothrombotic effects of smoking in ACS patients16. In a study by Angiolillo et al, increased platelet aggregation and activation were observed in diabetics as compared to non-diabetic subjects who were on long-term therapy (>1 month) of combined aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) treatment (p < 0.05 for all platelet function assays). Diabetic subjects had a higher number of clopidogrel nonresponders ( p < 0.04)17.

In our study, both aspirin and clopidogrel resistance was higher in diabetic patients and smokers. Aspirin resistance was higher in hypertensive population and patients with elevated LDL. The mechanism of resistance remains incompletely understood, although specific clinical, cellular and genetic factors have been shown to influence therapeutic failure. Causes of aspirin resistance are multifactorial ranging from clinical factors like noncompliance, failure to prescribe appropriate doses, nonabsorption and others; cellular factors like insufficient suppression of CoxI, genetic factors like COXI, Glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa receptor polymorphism etc. Variability in clopidogrel response can be due to extrinsic or intrinsic mechanisms such as drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4, or genetic polymorphisms of the P2Y12 receptor and CYP3As18, 19.

Several case-control studies have demonstrated that higher post treatment platelet reactivity is associated with adverse consequences. Chen et al showed adverse consequences of aspirin-resistance20 and Matetzky et al have shown a 25%increase in the recurrence of cardiovascular events during a 6-month follow-up in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with a reduced pharmacological response to clopidogrel21. Clopidogrel resistance is also associated with late stent thrombosis in post-PCI patients22. A recent study also reported that high platelet reactivity in Type 2 diabetes patients with coronary artery disease while on chronic dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with a higher risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular events23. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that platelet responsiveness carries direct clinical relevance. The treatment for failed antiplatelet therapy is as yet undefined. While in some of our patients after doubling the dose of the antiplatelet drugs, we observed satisfactory inhibition of platelet aggregation. Larger trials from India are required to find out the consequences of dual drug resistance and to advocate proper therapeutic options.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical support rendered by Sri Biswajit Bhar during the experiments.

Funding Sources

The present work is sponsored by DST, Govt. of India (SR\SO\HS-84\2004).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

None
References

1. Maree AO, Fitzgerald D Variable platelet response to aspirin and clopidogrel in atherothrombotic disease. Circulation. 2007. 24;115(16):2196-207.
2. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration: Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy. I. Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ 1994; 308:81 106.

3. The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494502.

4. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann III JT, et al, for the CREDO Investigators. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:24112420.

5. Geisler T, Langer H, Wydymus M, et al. Low response to clopidogrel is associated with cardiovascular outcome after coronary stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(20):2420-5.

6. Thomas H. Wang, Deepak L. Bhatt and Eric J. Topol Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity Eur. Heart J. 2006; 27:647-654.

7. Geisler T, Gawaz M. Variable response to clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007 ;33(2):196-202.

8. Victor L. Serebruany, Steven R. Steinhubl, Peter B. Berger,et al. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;45;246-251.

9. Paul A. Gurbel . Kevin P. Bliden. BS ; Joseph et al. Evaluation of Dose-Related Effects of Aspirin on Platelet Function: Results From the Aspirin-Induced Platelet Effect (ASPECT) Study; Circulation 2007;115;3156-3164.

10. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996;348:13291339.

11. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJG, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001;358:527533.

12. Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Poggio ED, et al. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 230235.

13. Sadiq PA, Puri A, Dixit M, et al. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in Indian patients with coronary artery disease. Indian Heart J 2005;57:658-61.

14. Mardikar H, Deo D, Deshpande N,et al. Variability in platelet response to a single daily dose of 150 mg enteric coated aspirin in a high risk population. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008 ;56:321-4.

15. Desai AA, Nayak V.K, Desai N.K, Gupta K.C. Effect of nifedipine and aspirin on platelet aggregation,A study in hypertensive patients and normal volunteers. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 1995; 27: 167 - 170.

16. Hung J, Lam JY, Lacoste L, Letchacovski G. Cigarette smoking acutely increases platelet thrombus formation in patients with coronary artery disease taking aspirin.Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9):2432-6.

17. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E et al.Platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Diabetes. 2005 ;54(8):2430-5

18. Desmond J. Fitzgerald and Andrew Maree. Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistance Hematology, Jan 2007; 2007: 114 - 120.

19. Lotrionte M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Agostoni P et al. Meta-analysis appraising high clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1199-206.

20. Chen WH, Lee PY, Ng W, et al. Aspirin resistance is associated with a high incidence of myonecrosis after non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention despite clopidogrel pretreatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:11221126.

21. Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, et al. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109: 31713175.

22. Muller I, Besta F, Schulz C, et al. Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement. Thromb Haemost 2003;89:783787.

23. Angiolillo DJ, Bernardo E, Sabaté M, et al. Impact of platelet reactivity on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 ;50(16):1541-7

Indian Heart J. 2009; 61:68-73
 
73